Modelo de gestión educativa para la articulación de la cátedra de Anatomía Humana y Medicina Legal en la carrera de medicina Educational management model for the articulation of the chair of Human Anatomy and Legal Medicine in the medical degree
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
La enseñanza de la Anatomía Humana en la carrera de Medicina presenta limitaciones metodológicas, como la dependencia de la memorización y la baja articulación con la Medicina Legal, lo que dificulta la aplicación práctica y el desarrollo de competencias integrales. El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar la efectividad del modelo Aula Invertida en la enseñanza de Anatomía Humana y su articulación con Medicina Legal, promoviendo motivación, comprensión y aplicación práctica de conocimientos. Se aplicó una metodología de investigación aplicada con enfoque descriptivo, utilizando una encuesta de 10 ítems tipo Likert aplicada a 214 estudiantes, organizada en cinco dimensiones: motivación, aprendizaje significativo, aplicación clínica, integración tecnológica y razonamiento crítico. Los resultados indicaron que la mayoría de los estudiantes percibió un aumento en la motivación, participación activa, comprensión de contenidos y aplicación en contextos clínico-legales, destacando la efectividad del modelo Aula Invertida y la integración de recursos digitales
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Citas
Araujo, J. (2018). Historia y evolución de la enseñanza de la anatomía. Revista Médica de Educación, 22(1), 45–53.
Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The Acquisition and Retention of Knowledge: A Cognitive View. Springer.
Azer, S. A. (2014). Integrating anatomy and clinical teaching. Clinical Anatomy, 27(2), 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22341
Azer, S. A., Alwaal, A., Alnajjar, W., & Al-Fehaid, L. (2015). Student-centered learning in anatomy education: A systematic review. Medical Teacher, 37(3), 276–287.
Barquín, R. (1995). Métodos de enseñanza y aprendizaje en educación superior. Madrid: Síntesis.
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE).
Betihavas, V., Bridgman, H., Kornhaber, R., & Cross, M. (2016). The evidence for “flipping out”: A systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 38, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.12.010
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871
Bleakley, A., Bligh, J., & Browne, J. (2011). Medical education for the future: Identity, power and location. Springer.
Bric, J., White, R., & Cornish, P. (2017). Simulation-based learning in undergraduate anatomy education. Clinical Anatomy, 30(2), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22871
Chen, F., Lui, A. M., & Martinelli, S. M. (2018). A systematic review of the effectiveness of flipped classrooms in medical education. Medical Education, 52(4), 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13465
Cheng, M., Cook, D., & Grant, J. (2014). Students’ perceptions of learning anatomy in a digital environment. Anatomical Sciences Education, 7(2), 137–145.
Drake, R. L., McBride, J. M., Lachman, N., & Pawlina, W. (2014). Medical education in the anatomical sciences: The winds of change continue to blow. Anatomical Sciences Education, 7(4), 253–259. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1390
Finkelstein, A., Woods, N., & Sharma, R. (2013). Use of virtual anatomy laboratories in medical education. Anatomical Sciences Education, 6(3), 142–150.
Fitzgerald, J. E. et al. (2018). Bridging the gap: integrating anatomy and clinical education. Medical Teacher, 40(7), 678–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1451912
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.
Haber, R., Lee, S., & Drake, R. (2017). Integrating anatomy with clinical practice: Approaches and outcomes. Medical Teacher, 39(2), 141–149.
Harden, R. M. (2000). The integration ladder: A tool for curriculum planning and evaluation. Medical Education, 34(7), 551–557. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00655.x
Issenberg, S. B. et al. (2005). Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations. Medical Teacher, 27(1), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590500046924
Khalil, M., Abdel Meguid, E., & Elkhider, I. A. (2018). Teaching of anatomical sciences: A blended learning approach. Clinical Anatomy, 31(2), 184–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23059
Khalil, M., Elkhider, I. A., & Almahmeed, A. (2016). Learning anatomy in the digital era: A review of e-learning applications. Medical Education Online, 21, 32932. https://doi.org/10.3402/meo.v21.32932
Kneebone, R. (2016). Simulation in surgical training: educational issues and practical implications. Medical Education, 50(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13099
Lewis, R., & Mayer, R. (2018). Multimedia learning and medical education. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 23, 507–521.
Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. Prentice Hall.
McNulty, J., Dempsey, C., & Allen, P. (2013). Problem-based learning in medical anatomy. Medical Teacher, 35(2), 108–113. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.727906
Michael, J. (2006). Where's the evidence that active learning works? Advances in Physiology Education, 30(4), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00053.2006
Nicholson, D. T., Chalk, C., Funnell, W. R. J., & Daniel, S. J. (2006). Can virtual reality improve anatomy education? Medical Education, 40(11), 1081–1087. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02519.x
O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
Parmelee, D., Michaelsen, L., Cook, S., & Hudes, P. (2012). Team-based learning: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 65. Medical Teacher, 34(5), e275–e287. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.651179
Roach, M., & Biswas, S. (2019). Student engagement in anatomy: Combining flipped classroom and problem-based learning. Anatomical Sciences Education, 12(5), 506–515. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1877
Rosen, K. R., Brown, J. S., & Issenberg, S. B. (2008). The educational efficacy of simulation in medical education. Medical Education, 42(3), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.02944.x
Yammine, K., & Violato, C. (2015). A meta‑analysis of the educational effectiveness of three‑dimensional visualization technologies in teaching anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education, 8(6), 525–538. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1510